Intended use and decision role
Write down whether the feature screens, ranks, scores, summarizes, recommends, routes, or otherwise influences candidates, employees, or workers.
Vendor evidence
If a vendor says AI hiring compliance is handled, ask what records you still need.
Vendor controls can be useful, but buyers still need practical evidence about intended use, workflow scope, human review, limitations, notices, and change tracking.
Buyer-side records
Keep enough evidence to explain how the tool is used in your workflow.
Human review and escalation
Keep reviewer instructions, override paths, exception notes, disabling options, and the owner responsible for checking vendor outputs.
Vendor limitations and change notes
Collect audit summaries, limitation statements, support articles, model-change notices, and renewal answers in one dated evidence file.
Practical boundary
Use vendor answers as inputs, not as a replacement for buyer records.
AI Hiring Compliance Radar helps organize operational evidence and source-backed follow-up tasks. It does not provide legal advice, certify tools, or replace qualified counsel.
Before relying on vendor assurance
Turn the vendor answer into a buyer-side evidence file.
Start with the evidence hub.
Use the hub to decide whether this is an inventory, renewal, pre-audit, or monthly operating workflow before choosing templates.
Open evidence hubCompare ongoing updates.
If vendor answers will change at renewal, model update, or workflow change, compare monthly evidence updates with a static checklist.
Compare monthly workflowReview checkout and download access.
Check how the Pro pack download, support path, and billing management work before subscribing.
Review checkout access